Binaural Background Noise Enhances Neuromagnetic Responses from Auditory Cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of binaural low-level background noise has been shown to enhance the transient evoked N1 response at about 100 ms after sound onset. This increase in N1 amplitude is thought to reflect noise-mediated efferent feedback facilitation from the auditory cortex to lower auditory centers. To test this hypothesis, we recorded auditory-evoked fields using magnetoencephalography while participants were presented with binaural harmonic complex tones embedded in binaural or monaural background noise at signal-to-noise ratios of 25 dB (low noise) or 5 dB (higher noise). Half of the stimuli contained a gap in the middle of the sound. The source activities were measured in bilateral auditory cortices. The onset and gap N1 response increased with low binaural noise, but high binaural and low monaural noise did not affect the N1 amplitudes. P1 and P2 onset and gap responses were consistently attenuated by background noise, and noise level and binaural/monaural presentation showed distinct effects. Moreover, the evoked gamma synchronization was also reduced by background noise, and it showed a lateralized reduction for monaural noise. The effects of noise on the N1 amplitude follow a bell-shaped characteristic that could reflect an optimal representation of acoustic information for transient events embedded in noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".