Guest Editorial: Security, Privacy, and Trust Analysis and Service Management for Intelligent Internet of Things Healthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To build a sustainable ecosystem, healthcare reinforced by the Internet of Things (IoT-Health) is a sector that makes a very useful contribution to society. With the aging of the world's population, the ability to monitor and protect people at home reduces costs and increases the quality of life. IoT healthcare has become a market with great potential, and IT giants such as IBM, Microsoft, and GE Healthcare develop products for specialized medical applications. Using IoT-Health for data collection and workflow automation is a great way to reduce waste and minimize human errors. However, the security of healthcare information is a major concern, and cybersecurity has become a significant threat for healthcare providers as well as governments to achieve sustainable city milestones. IT professionals must continually resolve health data security issues to help patients and the damage that healthcare security breaches can have on their lives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.025 | 0.031 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".