Novel Data-Driven Resilient Portfolio Risk Measures Using Sign and Volatility Correlations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portfolio risk management is an important success factor in an organization’s ability to deliver more business value. Moreover, constructing a true resilient portfolio is impossible without the inclusion of higher-order moments such as skewness and kurtosis. Recently there has been a growing interest in using machine learning methods with empirical variance covariance matrix of returns to study Markowitz portfolio optimization. A major drawback is that the tangency portfolios constructed by using the existing portfolio risk measures such as portfolio standard deviation, value-at-risk (VaR), conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), maximum absolute deviation (MAD) are always affected by the larger skewness and kurtosis of the portfolio return. This paper develops a set of metrics that extend the traditional portfolio Sharpe ratio (PSR) to measures that include skewness and kurtosis. Using a random portfolio approach, the paper demonstrates how to use these new metrics and optimize portfolios. Inclusion of higher moments such as skewness and kurtosis in portfolio risk management acknowledges the risk of asymmetric and heavy-tailed returns and can help in constructing resilient portfolios. For portfolio optimization, simple yet effective novel data-driven resilient portfolio risk measures incorporating skewness and kurtosis are presented in this paper. The results show that the performance of maximum mean-risk portfolios using the proposed portfolio risk measures based on volatility correlation and sign correlation outperform the commonly used tangency portfolio using portfolio standard deviation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".