Utilizing I‐shaped shear links as dampers to improve the behavior of concentrically braced frames
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary During the past few decades, concentrically braced frames (CBFs) have become a commonly used load‐resistant bearing system in steel structures, to overcome the post‐earthquake performance issues frequently associated with conventional seismic‐resisting structural systems. CBF systems have high lateral stiffness and lateral strength; however, they have low ductility and a low seismic energy dissipating capacity. Under seismic loading, the diagonal members of a CBF system are susceptible to buckling, causing hysteresis in the compression zone and severely reducing energy absorption. Although the use of steel dampers to enhance the behavior of CBF systems can prevent the buckling of CBF members and improve the hysteretic behavior of braces, their use imposes additional costs on structures. Therefore, in this paper, an I‐shaped steel damper with a shear yield mechanism is introduced which is economical, has a simple construction, and can be easily replaced after an earthquake. The proposed damper is evaluated numerically and parametrically. The results indicate that the proposed damper acts as a ductile fuse that prevents buckling of the diagonal members of a CBF system. It was found that both the web and flange plates contribute to the shear resistance, with the flange carrying approximately 15% of the shear force, as expressed in the equations presented. The overstrength obtained for the damper was found to be greater than the value of 1.5 proposed by the AISC. Equations are presented for the design of the proposed damper and the brace elements connected to the damper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".