MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3201144368 · doi:10.82308/49318

From basic auditory processing to complex musical skills: a structural and functional perspective

2014· article· en· W3201144368 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mary Elizabeth Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Cognitive scienceMusicalCommunicationPsychologyCognitive psychologyComputer scienceLinguisticsArtificial intelligenceArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sounds consist of pressure variations in the air; as such, they are only present in the moment and disappear immediately after they are produced, leaving only a trace in the nervous system. Thus, the processing of any auditory information requires the integration of events over time. This thesis consists of three neuroimaging studies that together converge on a broader understanding of the diverse auditory cortical networks that support the processing of temporal features of auditory stimuli. The three studies in this thesis were chosen to tap into three distinct types of auditory processes. Study 1 used a longitudinal design to investigate the developmental neuroanatomical correlates of 2 Hz frequency modulation processing, a skill previously shown to correlate with the phonological aspects of literacy abilities. Using voxel-based morphometry, we found that the frequency-modulation thresh- old was significantly correlated with grey-matter density in left Heschl’s gyrus at the age of 10 years, but that this correlation weakened with age. Additionally, we found that 2Hz frequency-modulation threshold significantly correlated with spelling abilities at this age, but only in the boys, who also showed a stronger correlation between frequency-modulation threshold and grey-matter density in left Heschl’s gyrus. These findings provide a neural basis for the hypothesis that 2 Hz frequency modulation processing directly relates to literacy abilities because the former relies on structures known to preferentially process dynamically changing temporal stimuli. The second study expanded the results of the first into the more complex task of melodic transposition. Using the same longitudinal design, we investigated whether the neuroanatomical correlate of musical transposition previously demonstrated in adults were present between the ages of 10 and 14.5 years. We found a relationship between cortical thickness in left intraparietal sulcus and performance on the transposed melody task in the 14.5 year-old girls but not in the 14.5 year-old boys; no such relationship was observed at the earlier tested ages (13, 11.5 and 10). We conclude that this relationship between structure and behavior is not fixed and that the effects observed in adults are due exclusively to neither training nor predisposition. The third study focused on the functional role of the intraparietal sulcus in systematic auditory transformations in adults. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a mental tempo-changing task to localize the cortical activity related to maintaining temporal invariance across acceleration and decelerations in tempo. The results showed that recruitment of the intraparietal sulcus is specifically related to successful mental transposition. The results of these three studies fill three distinct gaps in the neuroscientific literature on non-speech auditory processing and help develop a broad view of the neuroanatomical and functional correlates of both basic and complex auditory skills from adolescence to adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicNeuroscience and Music Perception→French-language works237,207→