MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201188090 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24316

A cross‐flow rotating packed bed toward desulphurization of marine exhaust gas

2021· article· en· W3201188090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yong Cai, Yanbin Li, Fei Jia, Yong Luo, Zhang‐Nan Wen, Guang‐Wen Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsExhaust gasPacked bedSeawaterEnvironmental scienceFlue-gas desulfurizationVolume (thermodynamics)Waste managementEngineeringChemical engineeringGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The marine exhaust gas containing SO 2 leads to serious impacts on human health and marine environments. Due to the strict emission standard of marine exhaust gas and the limited space of ships, desulphurization process intensification is urgent. Herein, a cross‐flow rotating packed bed (CF‐RPB) with a compact size was developed toward desulphurization of marine exhaust gas. According to the emission standards of different sea areas, the characteristics of simulated open seawater desulphurization (OSD) and closed alkali desulphurization (CAD) were systematically evaluated. The respective correlations for K y a of OSD and CAD were proposed to predict the height of CF‐RPB. The desulphurization efficiencies of 86% in the OSD and 97% in the CAD were achieved in a three‐stage CF‐RPB, satisfying the emission standard. Compared with the traditional spray tower, the CF‐RPB has a higher mass transfer coefficient with a smaller volume, which has great potential for desulphurization of marine exhaust gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207