A cross‐flow rotating packed bed toward desulphurization of marine exhaust gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The marine exhaust gas containing SO 2 leads to serious impacts on human health and marine environments. Due to the strict emission standard of marine exhaust gas and the limited space of ships, desulphurization process intensification is urgent. Herein, a cross‐flow rotating packed bed (CF‐RPB) with a compact size was developed toward desulphurization of marine exhaust gas. According to the emission standards of different sea areas, the characteristics of simulated open seawater desulphurization (OSD) and closed alkali desulphurization (CAD) were systematically evaluated. The respective correlations for K y a of OSD and CAD were proposed to predict the height of CF‐RPB. The desulphurization efficiencies of 86% in the OSD and 97% in the CAD were achieved in a three‐stage CF‐RPB, satisfying the emission standard. Compared with the traditional spray tower, the CF‐RPB has a higher mass transfer coefficient with a smaller volume, which has great potential for desulphurization of marine exhaust gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".