Comparison of the Alkali-Silica Reactivity of North Cyprus and South Cyprus aggregates; preliminary studies using RILEM method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) is regarded as one of the most deleterious concrete durability problems, known to cause severe deteriorations in reinforced concrete structures all around the world. ASR involves the reaction of alkaline concrete pore solution with silica minerals in the aggregates and as a result, hydrous alkali-silica gel is produced. Expansion caused by this gel upon absorbing moisture results in serious deterioration in concrete. Although the susceptibility of South Cyprus aggregates to ASR has been previously studied to a very limited extent in the past, no scientific information on the ASR susceptibility of North Cyprus aggregates are available in the related literature. Beşparmak (Pentadaktylos) Mountains (North Cyprus) and from Troodos Mountains (South Cyprus) are positioned close to each other; however, aggregates obtained from both mountains are known to differ in composition. This difference in composition has the potential to yield ASR performances varying significantly. The aim of this study was to carry out preliminary investigations on the alkali-silica reactivity performance of both North and South Cyprus aggregates under same conditions, in a systematic and comparative manner. Aggregates obtained from both mountains are tested in combination with CEM I and CEM II (with supplementary cemenetitious materials) under the exposure conditions of RILEM method AAR-2. Preliminary results showed that North Cyprus aggregates are potentially reactive when used with CEM II, where South Cyprus aggregates tested under same conditions are detected to have much higher levels of reactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".