MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201555240 · doi:10.32393/csme.2021.161

Scaling Of Downburst Outflows Simulated Using A Full-Scale Cooling Source Model With Different Ambient Conditions

2021· article· en· W3201555240 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiano AR Kondo, Leigh Orf, Eric Savory

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 4 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)Scale modelMeteorologyAerospace engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A downburst is a natural phenomenon that occurs during thunderstorms, creating hazards and damage to infrastructure, notably electricity transmission lines, due to the strong winds produced and the fact that those winds are, laterally, highly correlated compared to everyday synoptic winds. Downbursts are characterized by divergent and generally straight-line winds near the ground, which are naturally observed when several trees in a forest are pushed in one direction. A downburst may be modelled experimentally and also numerically using computational fluid dynamics. One of the experimental methods is the liquid release approach, which consists of releasing a volume of fluid that is slightly denser than the ambient fluid contained in a tank or flume, creating a downdraft that descends to the ground surface. Previous researchers used a solution of water and glycerol as the ambient fluid and an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution as the heavier fluid. They proposed length, time, and velocity scaling parameters, R0, T0, and V0, respectively, that allowed comparison of liquid release experiments carried out with different fluid densities, as well as with real events in nature. In addition, these scaling parameters allow comparison of experimental liquid release model data with numerical simulation results. The present project uses these parameters to scale numerical model data obtained by the simulation of a full-scale downburst using a cooling source model. The resulting non-dimensional velocity profiles have similar characteristics to the scaled non-dimensional profiles observed in full-scale field downburst measurements, and similar profiles to data from densitydriven downburst experiments. Furthermore, the scaling preserved the vertical location of the near-ground peak wind speed, which is of great interest to wind and structural engineers. These results demonstrated that the scaling parameters, R0, T0, and V0, work well for cooling source downburst simulations. The time scaling parameter T0 is determined by using the density percentage difference Dr/r obtained from the spatial average of densities within the thunderstorm cloud. This project also examines the influence of the ambient lapse rate on downburst events. Results showed that downbursts are affected by the ambient lapse rate, producing weak peak wind speed when the ambient lapse rate is lower than the dry adiabatic lapse rate, 9.8 K/km. Also, there is a delay in the evolution of the outflow when the ambient lapse rate is lower than the dry adiabatic lapse rate. However, the structure of the downflow and the outflow does not change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 4Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207