MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Blood–brain barrier permeability in survivors of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a pilot study

2021· article· en· W3201593720 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shih‐Han S. Huang, Katerina Pavenski, Ting‐Yim Lee, Michael T. Jurkiewicz, Aditya Bharatha, Jonathan D. Thiessen, Keith St. Lawrence, Jean Théberge, Jennifer Mandzia, David Barth, Christoph Licht, Christopher J. Patriquin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity Health NetworkWestern UniversitySt. Michael's HospitalLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraGastroenterologyInternal medicinePlateletConfidence intervalProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare, life-threatening disorder of systemic microthrombosis and organ ischemia. The etiology of chronic cerebrovascular outcomes in iTTP survivors is largely unknown. In this pilot study, we measured blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability in patients with iTTP at the start of remission and 6 months later. This prospective pilot study included 7 adult patients with incident iTTP. Eligibility criteria included ADAMTS13 activity < 10% and detectable inhibitor at diagnosis. Patients were recruited from London Health Sciences Centre in Canada (2017-2019) within 3 days of hospital admission and followed for 6 months after remission (defined as normalization of platelet count and lactate dehydrogenase with no clinical signs or symptoms of microvascular injury for more than 30 days after the last plasma exchange). All patients had cerebral computed tomography perfusion scans with BBB permeability surface product measurements. Patients (5 women, 2 men) had a mean age of 48 years (range, 21-77 years). At diagnosis, patients had a mean platelet count of 22 (standard deviation [SD], 25) × 109/L. At the start of remission, mean BBB permeability surface product was 0.91 (0.30) mL/min/100 g. Six months later, the mean permeability surface product was 0.56 (0.22) mL/min/100 g, with a mean difference of -0.312 mL/min/100 g (95% confidence interval: -0.4729 to -0.1510; P = .0032). In this pilot study of patients with iTTP, pathologically increased BBB permeability was evident, and although there was some improvement, this persisted 6 months after remission. Future work will explore the chronicity of these findings and their clinical implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood AdvancesSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207