Patches of Dual Functions for Wideband MIMO Array Antenna with Linear or Circular Polarization Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a design of a monopole-based four-element MIMO array antenna is proposed. The design is based on a novel technique that makes a patch be a ground plane of the next patch. Thus, each patch has a dual function. This method is named the sharing technique. Thus, for the first time, two of such antennas can be merged, providing a subminiature structure. The method is introduced step by step. Then, a 2×2 MIMO array with a total area of 49×49 mm 2 is designed, which provides a miniaturized of 57% (from 0.18λ 2 0 to 0.076λ 2 0 @ 1.7GHz). Two linearly-polarized array samples are evaluated. One sample with center-fed patches and another with off-center-fed. Both samples provide a semi-end-fire pattern with a minimum front-to-back (F/B) ratio of 11dB and 360° rotation capability with wide 10-dB S 11 bandwidths over 100%. Moreover, an ultra-wideband circularly polarized array with broadside radiation can be achieved by simultaneous, sequential exciting all ports. The antenna achieves isolation better than 15dB, peak efficiency of 95%, and 5.9dBi gain verified with different measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".