MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W320165769

The Most Dangerous Art: Poetry, Politics, and Autobiography after the Russian Revolution

2009· article· en· W320165769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Natasha Kolchevska

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPoliticsContext (archaeology)LiteratureBiographyScrutinyScholarshipRhetorical questionHistoryArtLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Donald Loewen. The Most Dangerous Art: Poetry, Politics, and Autobiography After the Russian Revolution. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008. xii, 224 pp. Bibliography. Index. $65.00, cloth.Donald Loewen opens his study with the somewhat rhetorical-at least in the Russian context-question: Could the act of writing poetry, or of identifying oneself as a poet, be a courageous or even heroic act? He proceeds to answer that question by examining five prose autobiographies of three of Russia's big four poets of the 20th century-Boris Pasternak, Osip Mandel'shtam, and Marina Tsvetaeva. Through a series of close readings of these prose works-interspersed at times with analysis of complementary poems-Loewen provides the first attempt in English to address these poets' responses to rapid changes in literary policies and politics in the first decades of Soviet rule. To an educated Russian of a certain age, this question would likely-and automatically-generate an affirmative response, but the question bears additional scrutiny for younger generations of Western readers and scholars, who are the most likely beneficiaries of Loewen's scholarship.Loewen's approach is chronological and, following a first chapter, in which he briefly surveys poetry's changing fortunes in the 1920s, he moves on to a discussion of Osip Mandel'shtam's 1923 work, The Noise of Time [Shum vremeni]. Chapter Three addresses Boris Pasternak's Safe Conduct [Okhrannaia gramota], which appeared in serialized form between 1929 and 1931, first in the journal The Star [Zvezda], and then in Aleksandr Voronskii's Red Virgin Soil [Krasnaia nov']. Chapter Four returns to Mandel'shtam and the increasingly combative stance that followed the recriminatory Kornfeld affair, which involved charges of plagiarism against the poet and resulted in his writing the unpublishable Fourth Prose [Chetvertaia proza] in the 1930s. Chapter Five examines two of Marina Tsvetaeva's extraordinary childhood memoirs Mother and Music [Mat' i muzyka] and The Devil [Chert], while the final chapter returns to Pasternak's late (1956) autobiography People and Propositions [Liudi i polozheniia].Loewen's approach in The Most Dangerous Art provides a synthesis of the familiar and the original: each chapter opens with a summary of earlier scholarship on the increasingly difficult situation for writers during the Soviet Union's first forty years, then proceeds to often passionate but informed analyses of the autobiographical works in question. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207