MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3201701915 · doi:10.11575/prism/39319

Decolonizing the Conceptualization of Trauma: An Indigenous Focusing-Oriented Approach

2021· dissertation· en· W3201701915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Danielle Tipple

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptualizationIndigenousSociologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Counselling psychology prides itself on social justice and diversity in treatment modalities. Yet, many Indigenous clients continue to receive culturally irrelevant treatment, as evidenced by high dropout rates and mistrust of the health care system. In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released 94 calls to action directly addressing the unlawful treatment of Indigenous Peoples throughout Canada. In response to the TRC and with the goal of decolonization, reconciliation, and reclamation, a jointly-struck task force was created on behalf of the Canadian Psychological Association and the Psychology Foundation of Canada. The task force highlighted the need for ethical Indigenous research and culturally relevant approaches to psychological treatment for Indigenous Peoples; hence, this research is a direct response to both documents. Utilizing a relational methodology and Indigenous research methods of conversation, witnessing, and reflexive journaling, this study sought to understand the conceptualization of trauma within Indigenous Focusing-oriented therapy (IFOT). Grounded in land and an Indigenous ontology, IFOT is a holistic, decolonizing approach to health and wellbeing. Resulting from the wisdoms shared by four knowledge holders versed in the teachings of IFOT, the conceptualization of trauma is understood through the Trauma Wisdom Tree and Medicine Roots. Indigenous Peoples hold centuries of wisdoms having survived through intergenerational trauma and cultural genocide. Thus, through connection with our Medicine Roots, clients can restore healing, balance, and harmony. Moreover, reflecting on the concept of survivance, intergenerational trauma and resistance to colonialism is honoured. In addressing decolonization, cultural appropriation, and the issue of “evidence”, these findings present implications for practice, research, and social justice within education, counselling psychology, and related fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.067
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→