MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201948921 · doi:10.1155/2021/5560559

Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Associations with Molecular Subtypes: A Case-Control Study

2021· article· en· W3201948921 on OpenAlexaff
Faustin Ntirenganya, Jean Damascene Twagirumukiza, Georges Bucyibaruta, Belson Rugwizangoga, Stephen Rulisa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Breast Cancer · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAfrican Academy of SciencesAfrican Population and Health Research CenterNew Partnership for Africa's DevelopmentGovernment of the United KingdomDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstWellcomeUniversity of the Witwatersrand, JohannesburgWellcome TrustStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteAlliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in AfricaCarnegie Corporation of New York
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOncologyCancerCase-control studyInternal medicineBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women and the leading cause of women’s cancer-related deaths and morbidity worldwide. In Rwanda, BC incidence is increasing with an unacceptably high mortality rate in premenopausal women. Objectives. The purpose was to identify modifiable BC risk factors and assess associations between common breast cancer risks factors and molecular subtypes in premenopausal women in Rwanda. Methods. This was a case-control study. Premenopausal women with histological confirmation of BC and frequency-matched for age controls were recruited. A preestablished questionnaire was administered to both cases and controls for sociodemographics, BC probable risk factors, and clinical and pathological characteristics. BC was classified into luminal A, luminal B, HER2-type, basal-like (triple negative), and unclassified molecular subtypes by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. 340 participants were recruited into the study (170 cases vs. 170 controls). The median age was 39 years. The majority of cases presented at advanced stages of the disease (51.2% in stages III and IV) and had invasive ductal carcinoma (98.2%). 60.6% had subtypes of poor prognosis (HER2 enriched 14.7%, triple negative 12.9%, and unclassified 32.9%). Alcohol intake <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mfenced open="(" close=")"> <a:mrow> <a:mtext>AOR</a:mtext> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>3.73</a:mn> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mn>95</a:mn> <a:mi>%</a:mi> <a:mi>C</a:mi> <a:mi>I</a:mi> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mn>2.19</a:mn> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>6.32</a:mn> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>&lt;</a:mo> <a:mn>0.001</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:mfenced> </a:math> , obesity/overweight in adolescence or early adulthood <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <e:mfenced open="(" close=")"> <e:mrow> <e:mtext>AOR</e:mtext> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>10.86</e:mn> <e:mo>,</e:mo> <e:mn>95</e:mn> <e:mi>%</e:mi> <e:mi>C</e:mi> <e:mi>I</e:mi> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:mn>4.82</e:mn> <e:mo>−</e:mo> <e:mn>24.4</e:mn> <e:mo>,</e:mo> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo>&lt;</e:mo> <e:mn>0.001</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:mfenced> </e:math> , history of primary infertility <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <i:mfenced open="(" close=")"> <i:mrow> <i:mtext>AOR</i:mtext> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>33.8</i:mn> <i:mo>,</i:mo> <i:mn>95</i:mn> <i:mi>%</i:mi> <i:mi>C</i:mi> <i:mi>I</i:mi> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mn>3.5</i:mn> <i:mo>−</i:mo> <i:mn>321.5</i:mn> <i:mo>,</i:mo> <i:mi>p</i:mi> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>0.002</i:mn> </i:mrow> </i:mfenced> </i:math> , nulliparity <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <m:mfenced open="(" close=")"> <m:mrow> <m:mtext>AOR</m:mtext> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>3.75</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mn>95</m:mn> <m:mi>%</m:mi> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mi>I</m:mi> <m:mtext> </m:mtext> <m:mn>1.61</m:mn> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mn>8.75</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>0.002</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:math> , and a history of benign breast disease <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <q:mfenced open="(" close=")"> <q:mrow> <q:mtext>AOR</q:mtext> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>6.06</q:mn> <q:mo>,</q:mo> <q:mn>95</q:mn> <q:mi>%</q:mi> <q:mi>C</q:mi> <q:mi>I</q:mi> <q:mtext> </q:mtext> <q:mn>1.19</q:mn> <q:mo>−</q:mo> <q:mn>30.73</q:mn> <q:mo>,</q:mo> <q:mi>p</q:mi> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>0.03</q:mn> </q:mrow> </q:mfenced> </q:math> were associated with the occurrence of premenopausal breast cancer. There was no significant difference between risk factor stratification per molecular subtype. Conclusion. Several reproductive, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors have been identified to be associated with premenopausal BC. Among them, alcohol intake and obesity/overweight during adolescence/early adulthood can be modified. Interventions targeting alcohol consumption and obesity/overweight in adolescents and young adults may decrease the incidence of premenopausal breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Breast CancerSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207