MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202034776 · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3115215

<i>On-Site/In Situ</i> Continuous Detecting ppb-Level Metal Ions in Drinking Water Using Block Loop-Gap Resonators and Machine Learning

2021· article· en· W3202034776 on OpenAlexaff
Sangmin Oh, Imtiaz Hossen, Juan Luglio, Gusphyl Justin, J.E. Richie, Henry Medeiros, Chung Hoon Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
FundersMarquette UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResonatorIonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceMetal ions in aqueous solutionMicrowaveBlock (permutation group theory)AmplitudeLoop (graph theory)MetalChemistryEnvironmental chemistryOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsMathematicsMetallurgyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave measurements and machine learning algorithms are presented to estimate metal ion concentrations in drinking water. A novel Block Loop Gap Resonator (BLGR) as a microwave probe is designed and fabricated to estimate Pb ion concentrations in city water as low as 1 ppb with an RMS error of 0.18 ppb. No physical contact between the BLGR probe and the water sample allows on-site/in-situ continuous detection of ppb-level metal ion concentrations. The S11 raw data (amplitude and phase) from the BLGR are used to classify and estimate metal ion concentrations using a support vector regression algorithm. The performance of the proposed method to estimate Pb concentrations in the presence of interfering metal ions (Cu2+, Fe3+, and Zn2+) is also evaluated, and it is found that the average measurement error remains less than 13%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207