An allgravity as a grand unification of forces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each type of Coulomb (Newton) charge corresponds to a kind of Coulomb (Newton) mass. Such a mass-charge duality principle explains the availability of the united rest mass and charge in a neutrino equal to all its mass and charge consisting of the electric, weak, and strong components and the range of other innate components. A neutrino itself, similarly to all other quantum matter with Coulomb (Newton) mass and charge, testifies hereby in favor of a kind of mononeutrino with magnetocoulomb (magnetonewton) rest mass and charge equal to all its mass and charge including the magnetoelectric, magnetoweak, and magnetostrong parts and the range of other innate parts. We discuss a theory in which symmetry between electricity and magnetism comes forward at the level of a grand unification mathematical logic as the defined symmetry between gravity and magnetogravity within the same allgravity responsible for all that in a curved space-time. This allgravity relates a graviton and a monograviton as a consequence of force unification forming a single allgraviton. Thereby, it establishes a set of forces and the role of mass and charge in their formation and thus directly reveals the most diverse properties of a curved space that have remained hitherto latent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it