MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202257477 · doi:10.82308/18676

Filler retention in papermaking by polymeric and microparticulate retention aid systems

2004· article· en· W3202257477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPapermakingFiller (materials)Water retentionRetention timeComposite materialProcess engineeringPulp and paper industryChemistryMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceChromatographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mineral pigments are added to paper with the aim of improving its optical and printing properties. The colloidal behavior of calcium carbonate filler shows a dependence on the quality of water used in suspensions, presence of dissolved and colloidal substances and type of polymer used as a retention aid. The role of the retention aids is to attach colloidal particles, such as fines and mineral pigments, to pulp fibers before or during the paper is made. Two very different single-component retention aids were utilized in calcium carbonate fillers destabilization and deposition on fibers. Cationic polyethylenimine destabilized or facilitated deposition of the filler on fibers by a charge neutralization mechanism while cationic polyacrylamide flocculated or deposited the filler on fibers via a bridging mechanism. In the presence of anionic dissolved and colloidal substances, the amount of cationic polyacrylamide had to be increased in order to achieve the same degree of pigment flocculation. The reason for the increase was due to the fact that the cationic polyacrylamide formed a polyelectrolyte complex with the anionic substances, namely sulfonated kraft lignin. The reaction between cationic polyacrylamide and lignin was found to be nearly stoichiometric. Low molecular weight cationic polyacrylamide formed mostly colloidal complexes while high molecular weight cationic polyacrylamide formed predominantly coacervate complexes; this was mainly due to differences in characteristic times of lignin association with the cationic polyacrylamide, clustering of polyacrylamide molecules and reconformation of polymer chains. The performance of two-component retention aid systems consisting of a cationic polyacrylamide and anionic microparticles were evaluated by deposition of calcium carbonate filler on pulp fibers. Kaolin clay and bentonite were used to heteroflocculate polyacrylamide-covered surfaces of the fibers and pigment. Due to their inability to delaminate, kaolin clay and acid-treated montmorillonite showed no effect of calcium carbonate filler deposition. After cation exchange with sodium-rich solutions, which caused the montmorillonite to delaminate, the montmorillonite flocculation efficiency considerably improved. Kaolin clay neither delaminated after the cation exchange nor improved calcium carbonate deposition. Bentonite was found to completely delaminate when using polyacrylamide-treated fibers. When added to a suspension of fibers, filler and cationic polyacrylamide, bentonite was found to be in a form of stacks containing on average four platelets. An alternative way to paper filling with pigment was tested on stationary sheets and on slow and fast Fourdrinier pilot paper machines. Using a secondary headbox on the pilot paper machines, a high degree of loading (above 30%) could be achieved using positive clay or calcium carbonate fillers. However, the fillers lowered the paper strength as they interfered with the fiber-fiber bonding in a similar fashion found in conventionally filled papers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it