MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202266027 · doi:10.26685/urncst.277

Is Hinokitiol Efficacious Against an Antimicrobial-Resistant Strain of Streptococcus pyogenes? A Research Protocol

2021· article· en· W3202266027 on OpenAlex
Amir‐Ali Golrokhian‐Sani, Yunbo Jiang, Sinan Kaka, Olamide Olanrewaju

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSynthesis of Organic Compounds
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsStreptococcus pyogenesMicrobiologyPenicillinAntimicrobialStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcusBiologyBacteriaAntibioticsStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Streptococcus pyogenes, a highly infectious and deadly gram-positive bacterium in the Group A Streptococcus family, that causes respiratory and skin infections. Treatments include oral penicillin and macrolides; however, penicillin and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes (e.g., A458) are emerging. Hinokitiol, beta-thujaplicin, has been thought to be an alternative solution to help fight against antimicrobial resistant strains of S. pyogenes as several studies have highlighted its bactericidal effects. These effects in turn, inhibit the production of bacterial adenosine triphosphate and bacteriostatic effects (growth inhibition) of hinokitiol on a related bacterium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and a variant of Streptococcus pyogenes, SSI-9. Furthermore, hinokitiol was found to be very efficacious against a penicillin and macrolide resistant gram-positive bacterium, indicating that penicillin and macrolides likely have a different mechanism of action from hinokitiol. This suggests that microbes are likely not resistant to hinokitiol. Therefore, by extrapolating this data, it is thought that hinokitiol may be efficacious in combatting A458, a concerning antimicrobial resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Methods: Every step would be performed under triple-blind conditions. Using a solvent control, penicillin G, streptomycin, and hinokitiol, an efficacy trial would be undertaken to evaluate the bactericidal/inhibitory effects of each drug and determine whether hinokitiol is superior to the current gold-standards. A two-way analysis of variance and multiple repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate efficacy. Results: It is expected that hinokitiol is efficacious against the resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes, A458 unlike streptomycin. Discussion: The strengths of this study are that a novel treatment was used and the experiment was conducted as a triple-blinded experiment. The limitations include its efficiency and the lack of knowledge of the treatment. The statistical test conducted for this study would evaluate whether hinokitiol has a statistically significant effect on a resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Conclusion: It is likely that hinokitiol will show a resistance-free effect on the two strains of Streptococcus pyogenes. This is a significant undertaking due to the dangers of antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes. However, further experiments need to be conducted to support this hypothesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it