MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202266027 · doi:10.26685/urncst.277

Is Hinokitiol Efficacious Against an Antimicrobial-Resistant Strain of Streptococcus pyogenes? A Research Protocol

2021· article· en· W3202266027 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir‐Ali Golrokhian‐Sani, Yunbo Jiang, Sinan Kaka, Olamide Olanrewaju

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSynthesis of Organic Compounds
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsStreptococcus pyogenesMicrobiologyPenicillinAntimicrobialStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcusBiologyBacteriaAntibioticsStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Streptococcus pyogenes, a highly infectious and deadly gram-positive bacterium in the Group A Streptococcus family, that causes respiratory and skin infections. Treatments include oral penicillin and macrolides; however, penicillin and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes (e.g., A458) are emerging. Hinokitiol, beta-thujaplicin, has been thought to be an alternative solution to help fight against antimicrobial resistant strains of S. pyogenes as several studies have highlighted its bactericidal effects. These effects in turn, inhibit the production of bacterial adenosine triphosphate and bacteriostatic effects (growth inhibition) of hinokitiol on a related bacterium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and a variant of Streptococcus pyogenes, SSI-9. Furthermore, hinokitiol was found to be very efficacious against a penicillin and macrolide resistant gram-positive bacterium, indicating that penicillin and macrolides likely have a different mechanism of action from hinokitiol. This suggests that microbes are likely not resistant to hinokitiol. Therefore, by extrapolating this data, it is thought that hinokitiol may be efficacious in combatting A458, a concerning antimicrobial resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Methods: Every step would be performed under triple-blind conditions. Using a solvent control, penicillin G, streptomycin, and hinokitiol, an efficacy trial would be undertaken to evaluate the bactericidal/inhibitory effects of each drug and determine whether hinokitiol is superior to the current gold-standards. A two-way analysis of variance and multiple repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate efficacy. Results: It is expected that hinokitiol is efficacious against the resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes, A458 unlike streptomycin. Discussion: The strengths of this study are that a novel treatment was used and the experiment was conducted as a triple-blinded experiment. The limitations include its efficiency and the lack of knowledge of the treatment. The statistical test conducted for this study would evaluate whether hinokitiol has a statistically significant effect on a resistant strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Conclusion: It is likely that hinokitiol will show a resistance-free effect on the two strains of Streptococcus pyogenes. This is a significant undertaking due to the dangers of antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes. However, further experiments need to be conducted to support this hypothesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicSynthesis of Organic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207