MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202365443 · doi:10.24926/19441992.541

Water Wars: Canada's Upstream Battle to Ban Bulk Water Export

2001· article· en· W3202365443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cynthia A. Baumann

Bibliographic record

VenueMinnesota journal of international law · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleUpstream (networking)Environmental scienceInternational tradeBusinessEngineeringHistoryAncient historyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

some regions, it has been suggested that water will become a "major element that defines national security."9 The security problem is particularly serious in the Middle East, where many water sources are shared, and use exceeds renewable supplies.Jordan and Israel have been able to satisfy about twenty percent of their water needs with their shared non-renewable ground water resources.10 Similarly, Saudi Arabia's water reserves may be depleted within fifty years. 1 In the United States, the problem is most notable in the Southwest, an arid region with poor water supplies and increasing development.12 Scarcity is certainly an issue, but only one part of the problem.Misuse of water is a more critical issue.For example, in California the agricultural industry uses eighty percent of the state's water resources to grow "low-value and water-intensive" crops in the desert.3 Another part of the problem is waste.Canadian residents, for example, consume over 300 liters per percent is potable.See Ontario wants U.S. to Join Ban on Exports of Water, LONDON

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0140.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinnesota journal of international lawSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207