MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202387809

EU Membership: The Quest for the Holy Grail

2017· article· en· W3202387809 on OpenAlexaff
Oleh Havrylyshyn

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in economic transition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingAccessionCompromiseIndependence (probability theory)Political scienceNegotiationEuropean commissionBureaucracyEconomic historyFellLawEuropean unionInternational tradeHistoryGeographyPoliticsBusinessPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract By the time Ukraine declared its independence on 24 August 1991, nearly two years had passed since the Berlin Wall fell, and all of the Central European countries plus the Baltics were far along in negotiating formal association agreements; the Visegrad Four were signed in March 1992. These agreements compromised on the language concerning future membership. The EU (more concretely the bureaucracy of the European Commission) had been insisting they had nothing to do with accession under article 237, and concerned only association under article 238. The Central European countries (led by Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary) had been pressing for a clause noting the AA was a stage towards accession. The compromise language only stated the candidate’s ‘ultimate objective’ of eventual membership and said nothing from the EU side. Echoes of this debate are heard twenty years later in the EU–Ukraine discussions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0150.012
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in economic transitionSame topicEuropean Politics and SecurityFrench-language works237,207