MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202596225 · doi:10.1109/aces53325.2021.00084

Fast Direct Solution of 2D Scalar Volume Integral Equation via Tensor Train Decomposition for Scatterers of Arbitrary Shape

2021· article· en· W3202596225 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Phillips, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegral equationDiscretizationMathematicsTensor (intrinsic definition)Matrix (chemical analysis)Conjugate gradient methodScalar (mathematics)Mathematical analysisConstant (computer programming)Rank (graph theory)Applied mathematicsGeometryAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of moments (MoM) discretization of the volume integral equation (VIE) is an effective tool for calculating field responses in the presence of arbitrary scatterers. This method scales poorly with problem size, however, due to the inherent difficulty of inverting the relevant matrix equations. The application of tensor train (TT) decomposition techniques has recently shown promise in alleviating the complexity of such calculations, with dramatic efficiency boosts in both computational time and memory having been proven possible for very simple scatterers. For arbitrary scatterers, previous work has shown that a conjugate gradient- TT (CG- TT) procedure was still capable of producing favorable runtime and memory complexities, particularly in quasi-constant rank regimes. In this work, we consider a direct solution of TT decomposed MoM matrix equation approach that is largely insensitive to MoM matrix condition number, while maintaining the generality of CG- TT. Preliminary results indicate that this approach is capable of matching the efficiency of CG- TT in the quasi-constant rank regime for scatterers of arbitrary geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES)Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207