Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐7 (rhBMP‐7/rhOP‐1): histological observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Susin C, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Lu PH, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD, Hall J, Wikesjö UME. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐7 (rhBMP‐7/rhOP‐1): histological observations. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 574–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01554.x. Abstract Background: Pre‐clinical studies have shown that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) coated onto purpose‐designed titanium porous‐oxide surface implants induces clinically relevant bone formation and osseointegration. The objective of this study was to examine the potential of rhBMP‐7, also known as recombinant human osteogenic protein‐1 (rhOP‐1), coated onto titanium porous‐oxide surface implants to support vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Bilateral, critical‐size, 5 mm, supraalveolar peri‐implant defects were created in six young adult Hound Labrador mongrel dogs. The animals received implants coated with rhBMP‐7 at 1.5 or 3.0 mg/ml randomized to contra‐lateral jaw quadrants. The mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced, adapted, and sutured to submerge the implants for primary intention healing. The animals received fluorescent bone markers at 3, 4, 7, and 8 weeks post‐surgery when they were euthanized for histological evaluation. Results: Without striking differences between treatments, the implant sites exhibited a swelling that gradually regressed to become hard to palpation disguising the implant contours. The histological evaluation showed robust bone formation; the newly formed bone assuming characteristics of the contiguous resident bone, bone formation (height and area) averaging 4.1±1.0 versus 3.6±1.7 mm and 3.6±1.9 versus 3.1±1.8 mm2; and bone density 56%versus 50% for implants coated with rhBMP‐7 at 1.5 and 3.0 mg/ml, respectively. Both treatments exhibited clinically relevant osseointegration, the corresponding bone–implant contact values averaging 51% and 47%. Notable peri‐implant resident bone remodelling was observed for implants coated with rhBMP‐7 at 3.0 mg/ml. Conclusions: rhBMP‐7 coated onto titanium porous‐oxide surface implants induces clinically relevant local bone formation including osseointegration and vertical augmentation of the alveolar ridge, the higher concentration/dose associated with some local side effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".