Availability and readiness of healthcare facilities and their effects on long-acting modern contraception use in Bangladesh: Analysis of linked data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim Evidence on the availability and accessibility of health facilities and their impacts on long-acting modern contraceptives (LAMC) use in low- and middle-Income countries are scarce. This study examined the influence of the availability and readiness of health facilities in determining the use of LAMC in Bangladesh. Methods We linked data of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey and the Health Facility Survey using the administrative-boundary linkage method. Mixed effect multilevel logistic regression was conducted. The sample comprised 10,938 married women of 15-49 years of age, who were fertile but did not desire a child within two years of the date of survey. The outcome variable was the current use of LAMC (yes, no) and the explanatory variables were health facility-, individual-, household- and community-level factors. Results Nearly 34% of participants used LAMC with significant variations across areas in Bangladesh. The average distance between the nearest LAMC-providing health facilities and women’s homes was 6.36 km, higher in the Sylhet division (8.34 km) and lower in the Dhaka division (4.34 km). Increased scores for the management (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.59; 95% CI, 1.21-2.42) and infrastructure (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-1.69) of health facilities were positively associated with the overall uptake of LAMC. AORs for women to report using LMAC were 2.16 (95% CI, 1.18-3.21) and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.15-3.20), respectively, for per unit increase in the availability and readiness scores to provide LAMC at the nearest health facilities. Nearly 27% decline in the likelihood of LAMC uptake was observed for every kilometer increase in the average regional-level distance between women’s homes and the nearest health facilities. Conclusion The availability of health facilities close to residence and their improved management, infrastructure, and readiness to provide LAMC play a significant role in increasing LAMC uptake among women. Policies and programs should prioritize increasing the availability and accessibility of health facilities that provide LAMC services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".