Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The management required for atopic dermatitis (AD) may worsen patient burden, thereby resulting in iatrogenic burden, that is, morbidity caused by medical treatment. We sought to describe the iatrogenic burden of AD and conducted a narrative review of key areas that clinicians can address to minimize it. Clinicians should think strategically about itch trigger avoidance, encourage slow incorporation of lifestyle changes, and emphasize step-up therapy when avoidance becomes too burdensome. Out-of-pocket treatment costs should be incorporated into shared decision making to balance affordability, preference, efficacy, and safety. Polypharmacy should be minimized by eliminating ineffective, nonevidence-based, and redundant therapies while appropriately stepping up to advanced therapy. Clinicians should take adequate time to communicate, the impact of AD on quality of life, and incorporate evidence-based guidelines. The multidimensional nature of AD requires a dynamic approach. Future guidelines should incorporate step-up, step-down, and maintenance approaches to reduce treatment burden and improve quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".