Hyperspectral and Full-Waveform LiDAR Improve Mapping of Tropical Dry Forest’s Successional Stages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the degree of regeneration in tropical dry forest (TDF) is critical for conservation policymaking and evaluation. Hyperspectral remote sensing and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) have been used to characterize the deterministic successional stages in a TDF. These successional stages, classified as early, intermediate, and late, are considered a proxy for mapping the age since the abandonment of a given forest area. Expanding on the need for more accurate successional forest mapping, our study considers the age attributes of a TDF study area as a continuous expression of relative attribute scores/levels that vary along the process of ecological succession. Specifically, two remote-sensing data sets: HyMap (hyperspectral) and LVIS (waveform LiDAR), were acquired at the Santa Rosa National Park Environmental Monitoring Super Site (SRNP-EMSS) in Costa Rica, were used to generate age-attribute metrics. These metrics were then used as entry-level variables on a randomized nonlinear archetypal analysis (RNAA) model to select the most informative metrics from both data sets. Next, a relative attribute learning (RAL) algorithm was adapted for both independent and fused metrics to comparatively learn the relative attribute levels of the forest ages of the study area. In this study, four HyMap indices and five LVIS metrics were found to have the potential to map the forest ages of the study area, and compared with these results, a significant improvement was found through the fusion of the metrics on the accuracy of the generated forest age maps. By linking the age group mapping and the relative attribute mapping results, a dynamic gradient of the age-attribute transition patterns emerged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".