MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202819101 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.110416

Special Nuclear Material Identification Through One-Minute Measurement with a New Backpack Radiation Device in Real Scenario Conditions

2021· article· en· W3202819101 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giacomo Mangiagalli, Massimo Morichi, Andrea Pepperosa, L. Stevanato, Isacco Bonesso

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear materialNeutronNuclear engineeringIdentification (biology)Environmental scienceIdentifierNeutron sourceNeutron detectionComputer scienceRadiochemistryNuclear physicsPhysicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The constant concerns in global nuclear safety, aimed at deterring and combating the illicit trafficking of Material Out of Regulatory Control (MORC) and its possible use in criminal acts has raised the necessity of new detection solutions with higher efficiency and resolution to provide a high level of accuracy in the report to the authorities. Today’s radioactive isotope identifiers perform gamma spectroscopy identification and, sometimes, neutron counting. This paper presents the results of measurements performed in real-scenario conditions with a new type of portable radioactive isotope identifier for the detection and identification of both gamma and neutron sources. Its singular features are: 1) the capability to identify sources through the detection of neutrons, discriminating spontaneous fission sources (Cf-252), α-n sources (Am/Be, Am/Li) and nuclear material containing mix of isotopes of plutonium or uranium 2) the capability to make cross correlation between gamma and neutron measurements to achieve a higher level of accuracy in the identification of SNM that emits both neutrons and characteristics gammas. The test results are compared with international standards. The device exceeds the standard performance by triggering a neutron alarm for a 20.000 n/s Cf-252 source at a five times greater distance than the ANSI N42.34 one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207