Hydro thermal synthesis and electrochemical characterization of (V1/2Sb1/2Sn)O4 and (Fe1/2Sb1/2Sn)O4 as energy storage materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports the hydrothermal synthesis of alloy anode materials (V1/2Sb1/2Sn)O4 and (Fe1/2Sb1/2Sn)O4 and determine the effect of heat treatment on reversible capacities of the two oxides, and evaluation of their electrochemical properties. The compounds were initially prepared using the hydrothermal method at 180°C, and part of the active materials were reheated at 500°C in the air to improve the crystallinity and reduce the impurities. The materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, and BET surface area. Anodic electrochemical behavior was examined by cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic cycling, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results show that (Fe1/2Sb1/2Sn)O4 reheated at 500°C delivers a better capacity of ∼400 mAh/g at 0.005-1.0 V voltage range up to 60th cycle. When we cycled a higher cut-off voltage of 0.005-3.0V, higher reversible capacity and higher capacity fading were noted due to alloying and conversion reaction of these mixed oxides. Cyclic voltammetry studies show reversible alloying/de-alloying peaks at ∼0.25 and ∼0.5 V vs. Li
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".