MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203029427 · doi:10.2118/204517-ms

Challenges of D-SAGD Completion

2021· article· en· W3203029427 on OpenAlexaff
John Graham, Cody Hollohan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkoverCompletion (oil and gas wells)InjectorPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionInstallationSteam-assisted gravity drainageOil wellEngineeringInjection wellOil sandsMechanical engineeringAsphaltMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the production well of a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) injector-producer well-pair, Direct-to-SAGD (D-SAGD) reservoir steam chamber development and electrical submersible pump (ESP) deployment requires only a single workover, effectively performing the jobs in parallel. This is an improvement over the traditional approach where reservoir steam chamber development and ESP deployment occur sequentially, each requiring a dedicated workover. The D-SAGD completion not only eliminates all costs associated with one workover, but also minimizes the heat energy dissipation that would otherwise occur over several days of steam injection downtime associated with pulling the completion string and installing the artificial lift system, along with decreased time, and increased safety, among other attendant benefits. Traditionally, an initial completion is performed on the production well to install monitoring instrumentation and a steam injection string, then steam injection occurs through both the injection and production wells for approximately 90 to 120 days. Once the reservoir temperature has reached a predetermined midpoint temperature between the wells, a fall-off test is performed by halting steam injection in both the production and injection wells and monitoring the completion's heat energy distribution profile throughout the length of the liner from heel to toe as the well cools back down toward its steady state temperature. If the results of the fall-off test are satisfactory, then subsequently a second workover is performed to install the ESP into the production well. Lastly, steam injection in the injector well is resumed, and the ESP operation begins. Given that the single D-SAGD workover achieves both the deployment of instrumentation and the ESP prior to steam chamber development, this implies that the ESP is required to withstand the large temperature and pressure fluctuations inherent to the combination of steam chamber development and fall off testing, all prior to being powered on for production to begin. This represents an unprecedented challenge for ESP seal sections. Among several other novel challenges, if the internal oil volume contraction induced by the deep temperature drop of the fall off test exceeds the capacity of the seal section to compensate for it, then the seal and motor may flood with wellbore fluid prior to the first attempt at turning it on. This paper discusses the unique challenges associated with the D-SAGD completion as it relates to ESP reliability. A SAGD-spec ESP remaining downhole for several months at unprecedented bottom hole pressure and temperature, and withstanding the associated fall-off test is a meaningful deviation from the conventional SAGD application, and this paper will detail the considerations associated with achieving ESP reliability in a D-SAGD completion that is comparable to that achieved in the conventional SAGD completion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207