MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203082638

Assessment of the impact of climate change on Fraser River low flows

2020· dissertation· en· W3203082638 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aneesh Kochukrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)StreamflowDrainage basinDischargeWater resourcesWatershedGeographyGeologyEcologyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the winter season, rivers in cold regions typically carry low discharges. Long-term forecast of river low flows is of practical importance. For example, authorities need the forecast to decide on water resources allocations and permits of the maximum allowable waste-effluent discharges from the land-based industry into a receiving river. Low river flows have important implications for river water quality and the health of aquatic life. Previously, there have been many investigations of the influence of climate change on river discharge, both low and high flows. Some studies of the Fraser River in British Columbia, Canada, dealt with the influence of climate change on flow and water temperatures. However, there is a lack of studies that consider the impact on low river flows under climate change scenarios. This study aims at improving the understanding of the impact of rising temperatures due to climate change on the low flows of the Fraser River. Specially, this study will reveal how the magnitudes of historic Fraser River low flows are related to freezing temperatures and will answer the question of to what extent low flows will change in response to projected changes in atmospheric temperature. The scope of work includes statistical analyses of the correlation between historic observations of Fraser River flows and watershed air temperatures over a time period of more than 100 years. The temperature data input is derived based on averaging values from 52 stations in the Fraser River basin. The variations in flow discharge with varying temperatures show uncertainties over the years. This study considers the cumulative freezing and thawing effects of fluctuating temperatures and divides the observed winter low flows into a lower limb and an upper limb. The correlation between discharge, Q, and temperature is established on the basis of the lower limb, yielding Q as a function of cumulative temperature, , in terms of z scores of the two variables. Global land and ocean surface temperature anomalies in the historical data are noted in several of the historic years, but their influence is removed while establishing this Q- relationship. A confidence bound relationship between flow and temperature is established for the thawing days, where the flow increases from its lowest value. The Q- relationship is further applied for forecast of future low flows, with input of temperatures from six Global Climate models (GCMs) with Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 4.5 & 8.5 of the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX GDDP) dataset. Long term forecast of river low flows is obtained. The results show an increase in the minimum flow discharge up to 48% under high emission scenarios by the end of the 21st century. Under low emission scenarios, the minimum flow discharge can increase by 11%. The methods developed in this study can be applied to other cold region rivers. This is useful for addressing the issue of climate change impacts on river low flows, making necessary adjustments to the hydraulic design of water resources infrastructures, and planning the protection of aquatic life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207