ÉTUDE DE LA DIGESTIBILITE DE LA POUDRE DE FEUILLES DE MORINGA CHEZ LES JUVENILES DE OREOCHROMIS NILOTICUS (LINNAEUS, 1758)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThe use of fishmeal in fish rations raises economic, ethical and social concerns. In Mali, Moringa leaf powdercan be an alternative based on its composition and availability. However, a feeding ingredient may appear to bean excellent source of its chemical composition, but will be of little real value unless it can be digested andabsorbed by the target species.The aim of this study was to determine the apparent digestibility of Moringaoleifera leaf powder for two age groups of Oreochromis niloticus juveniles. The apparent Digestibilitycoefficients (CDA) were determined using the tilapia reference (R0) and digestibility (R0 - 30% Moringa - R30)leaf powder regimen in both fish groups. Fish were fed twice a day to satiety. Fecal samples were siphonedevery morning. The results show that both diets have a protein CDA greater than 93% and that raw fiber isindigestible regardless of the fish category. The leaves powder of Moringa used has good digestibility.Keywords: Moringa Oleifera, Oreochromis Niloticus, apparent digestibility
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".