MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203255290 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2021.0199

Remnants of the Franco-Algerian Rupture: Archiving Postcolonial Minorities by Mona El Khoury

2021· article· en· W3203255290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Sparks

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNorth African History and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeColonialismContext (archaeology)Collective memoryHistoryFilm directorSociologyArt historyLawLiteratureArtMovie theaterPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Remnants of the Franco-Algerian Rupture: Archiving Postcolonial Minorities by Mona El Khoury Benjamin Sparks El Khoury, Mona. Remnants of the Franco-Algerian Rupture: Archiving Postcolonial Minorities. Lexington, 2020. ISBN 978-1-7936-1769-9. Pp. 307. Archives and national histories often tend to tell the story of historical majorities, thereby creating an official narrative that leaves out minority memories. The colonial and postcolonial history of France and Algeria is full of ruptures in which the national memory omits minority experiences, creating a conflicted collective memory. In the colonial context, even encounters signify ruptures, such as the Algerian Jews who became French citizens after 1870, at the cost of legal and symbolic separation with their neighbors. Similarly, the Harkis, those Algerians enlisted in the French military, became traitors rejected by their communities. These ruptures leave remnants, which Mona El Khoury considers as an expression of memory that does not blend seamlessly into the official narrative. The postcolonial encounters are not free from rupture and remnants, particularly involving "mixed races" and the Pieds-Noirs. The author looks at these four categories (Jews, Harkis, mixed-race, and Pieds-Noirs) as historical minorities that defy national and cultural categorization in the colonial and post-colonial sphere, but nonetheless remain lasting markers of the past. The forgotten memories in the national narrative come to light in the literary works of minorities that exhume the past and create a type of minor(ity) archive. These works, through their dissonant memorial reconstructions, challenge the official history. El Khoury examines how writers confront fragmented and traumatic pasts by addressing the works of Cixous, Rahmani, Bouraoui, and Sansal. The author follows the thematic elements of the novels chronologically, beginning with Cixous in colonial Algeria. El Khoury argues that Cixous's Les rêveries de la femme sauvage, regarding Algerian Jews, addresses other memories of colonization than those traditionally commemorated in France. The focus then moves to the Harkis through an analysis of Moze by Rahmani. The Harkis' complicated relationship with France affects future generations and their identity and memory, creating a "harkive," a counter-history, which is more accurate than the French state's official version. The author then examines the métis, who represent in the works of Bouraoui the conflicted relationship and historical tensions between France and Algeria that endure in the contemporary postcolonial realm. This work culminates with an analysis of the Pieds-Noirs, in Sansal's L'enfant fou de l'arbre [End Page 233] creux, during three different periods: colonial Algeria, the War of Independence, and the Algerian Civil War. El Khoury argues that this novel becomes a sort of archive of the future that re-envisions Pied-Noir identity. Remnants of the Franco-Algerian Rupture offers an engaging sociohistorical study of the importance of minorities in the national archival process and of the role of literature in displaying a counter-archive. Benjamin Sparks University of Memphis (TN) Copyright © 2021 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicNorth African History and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207