Comparison of the Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A and Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin type A with corticosteroid in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis (PF). DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 35 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: one group received methylprednisolone in to the plantar fascia ( n = 18) and the other group received botulinum toxin type A injection into the flexor digitorum brevis and quadratus plantae ( n = 17). All injections were performed under ultrasound guidance. Patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measures, and plantar fascia thickness before the intervention, 3 wks, 12 wks, and 6 mos after the treatment. RESULTS: In both groups, patients' pain and function improved significantly up to 3 wks after injection. In the botulinum toxin type A group, morning Visual Analog Scale improved significantly at 12 wks after intervention and the improvement was sustained for another 3 mos. In the botulinum toxin type A group, Foot and Ankle Ability Measures-sports subscale improved in all evaluated points, whereas in the corticosteroid group, the improvement was significant only when comparing follow-ups values to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Both ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A and corticosteroid injection were effective in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Our study showed that the effects of botulinum toxin type A injection last longer than those of steroid injection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".