MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203386166 · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000008232

Long Term Speech and Feeding Outcomes in Patients With Pierre Robin Sequence

2021· article· en· W3203386166 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Morzycki, Curtis Budden, Samuel L. Skulsky, Loredana Cuglietta, Regan Guilfoyle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Craniofacial Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePierre Robin syndromeAirwayIntubationAirway obstructionPsychological interventionPediatricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Airway obstruction in newborns with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) may be managed with tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), or tracheostomy to prevent airway compromise when conservative airway interventions fail or are contraindicated based on the type of obstruction present. Unfortunately, some of these procedures have the potential to affect a child's speech and feeding development. METHOD: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all children with PRS treated at our institution in the last 25 years. Our primary outcomes of interests were: (1) consonant production errors; (2) achievement of full oral feeds; (3) need for prolonged gastrostomy tube feeds; and (4) avoidance of tracheostomy. RESULTS: Seven (7/73, 10%) children required intubation at birth for respiratory failure. Forty-two children were treated with TLA (42/73, 58%), 2 with MDO (2/73, 3%), and 1 (1/73, 1%) with tracheostomy. Twenty-one (21/73, 29%) were treated with conservative airway interventions. Of the 7 children requiring intubation, 1 required tracheostomy, and 6 required TLA. Five children who received TLA initially proceeded to tracheostomy. Of the 3 children who underwent MDO, 2 required tracheostomy. Of the 2 patients who underwent MDO, 2 failed, requiring tracheostomy. One child required tracheostomy as the first airway intervention. Among all children with PRS, /s,z/ speech errors were the most common. Children treated with conservative airway interventions had significantly fewer /sh/ errors at age 3 (X = 6.604, P < 0.05) relative to those treated with TLA, MDO, and/or tracheostomy. Consonant production errors extinguished over time, with significantly less /s,z/ errors produced at age 8 compared to at ages 3 (Z = -2.263, P < 0.01), 4 (Z = -2.449, P < 0.05), 5 (Z = -2.775, P < 0.01), and 6 (Z = -2.049, P < 0.05). Among all children, 70% (51/70) were able to achieve full oral feeds. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes speech-production and feeding outcomes in children with PRS. Tongue-tip sound errors, including /s,z/, are prominent early in speech development but later extinguish, a pattern of speech maturation that follows that of typically-developing children.Most children were able to achieve full oral feeds, with few requiring prolonged g-tube placement. We hope these results serve as a useful tool in managing speech and feeding in children with TLA, and when counselling patients with PRS requiring definitive airway surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Craniofacial SurgerySame topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207