MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203388214

IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN PAKSITAN

2019· article· en· W3203388214 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Syeda Amna Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Food and Nutritional Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnemiaMedicineSocioeconomic statusPsychological interventionMenstruationIron deficiencyPregnancyIron-deficiency anemiaEnvironmental healthGovernment (linguistics)PediatricsPopulationPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron deficiency anemia is highly prevalent in developing countries like Pakistan. It is quite predominant in the university community especially among pregnant women. The fetus's and newborn infant's iron status depends on the iron status of the pregnant woman and therefore, iron deficiency in the mother-to-be means that growing fetus probably will be iron deficient as well. Group that is at the highest risk of anemia in society is women in their reproductive years. Multiple reasons such as menstruation, gender discrimination, low socioeconomic status, genetics, lack of proper nutrients and poor medical assistance and access can be blamed for this condition. The outcomes are fatigue, compromised neonatal health, lack of focus and mental disorders. One-fifth women are anemic in Pakistan, says statistics of WHO. Prevalence in ever married women of 15-44 years is 26% in urban and 47% in rural areas, which shows failure of interventions. It is burdening Pakistan's health care systems and economy. People needs to be educated on preventing anemia, identifying its symptoms, treatment and consequences through media, articles campaigns, hospitals and government needs to provide affordable supplements and proper nutritional guide lines to the concerned patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Food and Nutritional SciencesSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207