MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203420891

Registros de memória: um estudo acerca de aspectos cognitivos pós-internação em UTI

2021· article· pt· W3203420891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCiências & Cognição · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative and Oncologic Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive careHumanitiesCognitionPsychologyPhilosophyPsychiatryIntensive care medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existem evidencias sobre as consequencias de curto e longo prazo, de doencas criticas, a partir da internacao do paciente em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI). Mesmo apos a alta, o individuo pode manifestar sequelas significativas que prejudicam a manutencao de sua qualidade de vida, no que diz respeito as capacidades fisicas, cognitivas e psicologicas, fenomeno atualmente conhecido como Sindrome Pos-Cuidados Intensivos (Post-Intensive Care Syndrome - PICS). O estudo buscou avaliar a prevalencia de comprometimento cognitivo relacionado a outros fatores inerentes a internacao em pacientes sobreviventes da UTI. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de coorte, de carater retrospectivo e abordagem quanti-qualitativa. Foram analisados dados de pacientes internados em UTI, que passaram por avaliacao especializada e realizaram os testes de rastreio Montreal Cognitive Assessment e Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressao. A maior parte dos individuos apresentou comprometimento cognitivo apos internacao e se evidenciou que a memoria tem principal impacto dentre os aspectos cognitivos mais afetados. O presente estudo tem potencial de contribuir para o conhecimento a respeito de fatores cognitivos relacionados a PICS e suas repercussoes. Ademais, a psicologia da saude e hospitalar tem papel importante como meio de prevenir e/ou minimizar os efeitos da sindrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it