MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203760485 · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3765

Identifying nesting grounds for juvenile migratory birds with dual isotope: an initial test using North American raptors

2021· article· en· W3203760485 on OpenAlexaff
Brooke E. Crowley, Clément P. Bataille, Bruce A. Haak, Kaitlin M. Sommer

Bibliographic record

VenueEcosphere · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeatherJuvenilePopulationIsotopeStable isotope ratioStrontiumIsotopes of strontiumIsotope analysisEcologyRange (aeronautics)HabitatBiologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding seasonal mobility, population connectivity, and site fidelity is critical for managing and preserving migratory species. We investigated the potential of coupling strontium ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) and hydrogen (δ 2 H) isotopes in feathers for quantitatively constraining natal origin for juvenile migratory predatory birds (raptors) using a probabilistic framework. We first calibrated single‐isotope models that predict spatial isotope variability in raptor feathers (called isoscapes) by analyzing and compiling isotope data for juvenile birds with known origins in North America and comparing their values to existing isotopic baselines in precipitation (for δ 2 H) and bioavailable strontium (for 87 Sr/ 86 Sr). We then compared the potential of hydrogen and strontium isotopes for refining geographic assignments either independently or combined. While yielding very different probability maps, hydrogen and strontium isotopes performed equally well at constraining regions of natal origin. However, thanks to the complementarity of these isotopes, dual δ 2 H and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr assignments increased predictive precision by an order of magnitude compared to either isotope alone. Lastly, we used the models to predict natal origin for juveniles with unknown origins that were sampled in southwestern Idaho, USA, during their autumn migration. The precision of geographic assignments for birds with unknown origins varied. Nevertheless, dual‐isotope assignments clearly distinguished individuals born outside of southwestern Idaho, and overall, predicted geographic assignments matched breeding ranges for the study species. Quantitative dual‐isotope geographic assignments enhance our ability to predict natal range of migratory raptors and complement other methods for monitoring movement and population connectivity. Combining isotopic data from feathers with other intrinsic geochemical and genetic data, as well as extrinsic markers, such as transmitters or bands, and niche‐modeling approaches will further refine key nesting areas for migratory birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcosphereSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207