MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203769509 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djab197

Prospective Cohort Study of Pre- and Postdiagnosis Obesity and Endometrial Cancer Survival

2021· article· en· W3203769509 on OpenAlexaff
Renée L. Kokts‐Porietis, Jessica McNeil, Andria R. Morielli, Linda S. Cook, Kerry S. Courneya, Christine M. Friedenreich

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioWaistBody mass indexEndometrial cancerProportional hazards modelInternal medicineAnthropometryObesityCancerConfidence intervalCohortCohort studyProspective cohort studyWaist-to-height ratioCircumferenceGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) associations with anthropometric measures of obesity and changes in these exposures remain unknown among endometrial cancer survivors. METHODS: Endometrial cancer survivors diagnosed between 2002 and 2006 completed direct anthropometric measurements and self-reported lifetime weight history during in-person interviews approximately 4 months after diagnosis (peridiagnosis) and approximately 3 years after diagnosis (follow-up). Participants were followed-up until death or March 20, 2019. Cox proportional regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for body mass index (BMI), weight, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio with DFS and OS. Statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: A total of 540 and 425 cancer survivors were assessed peridiagnosis and follow-up, respectively. During the median 14.2 years of follow-up (range = 0.3-16.5 years), 132 participants had a recurrence and/or died (DFS), with 111 deaths overall (OS). Reduced DFS was noted with greater recalled weight 1 year before diagnosis (HR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.15 to 3.07), BMI 1 year before diagnosis (HR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.09 to 3.22), and measured peridiagnosis BMI (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.18 to 3.53). Measured peridiagnosis waist circumference of at least 88 cm was associated with decreased DFS (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.03) and OS (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.16 to 3.13). A twofold decrease in DFS and OS was associated with a BMI of at least 5% or weight change from 1 year before diagnosis to peridiagnosis. No associations were observed for the assessment during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: One-year before- and peridiagnosis anthropometric measures of obesity were associated with reduced survival among endometrial cancer survivors. Anthropometric changes from 1 year before to peridiagnosis may provide an important indication of future survival in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207