The Agreement of Complex Sentence and its Meanings in the Last Quarter of Holy Quran- Selected Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is entitled (The Structural Agreement of Complex Sentence and its Meanings in the Last Quarter of Holy Quran - Selected Models) the Noble Qur’an through the varying linguistic methods that are relied upon in the formulation of sentences and texts, and among these methods: (constructive) which does not bear truth and lies in and of itself. Given the importance of this topic, the study came as an application to the last quarter of the Holy Qur’an; To reveal the manifestations of the rhetorical inimitability in it, as well as to find the connotations contained in the construction methods in different rhetorical contexts, and these methods are characterized by their various suggestive and semantic ability that vary in the diversity of the tools and contexts of the method. The research includes a study of the imperative construction represented in the style of (the command, the prohibition, the question, the wish, and the call), a theoretical and applied study at the same time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".