Organisational Work Pressure Rings a 'Time-Out' Alarm for Children: A Dual-Career Couple’s Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the considerable increase of women’s share in workforce in all types of organisations and levels, their work and non-work demand has also increased. Therefore, dual career couples always faces new work-life challenges and a spill over effect on work and family demands. Their parenting role also got diverted to work demands due to increased organisational work pressure. However, new parents are even more occupied and restless as both of them are at the beginning phase of their career, perhaps getting less time to pay attention to their kids. This study is an empirical research on dual career couple. Data is being collected from various countries like India, USA, Canada, Australia and a sample of 70 working couples are taken. A questionnaire was framed, using a 5-point likert scale, consisting of 40 statements. The Cronback’s Alpha came out to be .80. Chi –square analysis technique has been used to show that there is a significant association between the organisational work pressure and age of children. This study provides the evidence that young parents, whose children age are under 2, always miss quality time with their children due the increased work pressure and stress and not able to manage time for them. This always results into high absenteeism, turnover and less organisational commitment. The results are discussed from variable children’s age perspective. Also implications of these findings are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".