MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204014731 · doi:10.1002/cncr.33922

Subsequent malignant neoplasms in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: Occurrence of cancer types in which human papillomavirus is an established etiologic risk factor

2021· article· en· W3204014731 on OpenAlexaff
Tara O. Henderson, Brynn Fowler, Haley A. Hamann, Paul C. Nathan, Jillian Whitton, Wendy M. Leisenring, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Joseph P. Neglia, Lucie M. Turcotte, Michael Arnold, Miriam Conces, Rebecca M. Howell, Leslie L. Robison, Gregory T. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineCumulative incidencePopulationRelative riskRisk factorAbsolute risk reductionConfidence intervalPoisson regressionCervical cancerCancerIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyInternal medicineGynecologyCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNHPV) in childhood cancer survivors are poorly understood. Methods The cumulative risk of SMNHPV was assessed among 24,363 Childhood Cancer Survivor Study participants. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risk were calculated using age‐matched, sex‐matched, and calendar year rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Poisson regression models identified SMNHPV risk factors, evaluating relative SIRs (rSIR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results In total, 46 survivors developed an SMNHPV (median age, 31 years [range, 10‐56 years]; median time from primary cancer, 21 years [range, 9‐35 years]). SMNHPV sites included oropharynx (N = 44), anorectum (N = 6), uterine cervix (N = 2), and vulva (N = 2). The 33‐year cumulative incidence was 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2%‐0.4%), and the SIR was nearly 3‐fold that of the general population (SIR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.05‐4.00). Female survivors were not at increased risk of cervical or vulvar cancers compared with the general population. All survivors had an elevated risk of oropharyngeal SMNHPV (males: SIR, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.37‐6.97; females: SIR, 8.44; 95% CI 4.88‐14.61) and anorectal SMNHPV (males: SIR, 13.56; 95% CI, 5.09‐36.13; females: SIR, 9.15; 95% CI, 2.29‐36.61). Males (vs females: rSIR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.00‐3.94); head, neck, and pelvic radiotherapy doses >3000 centigray (vs none: rSIR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.11‐4.97); and cisplatin‐equivalent doses >400 mg/m2 (vs none: rSIR, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.78‐11.43) were associated with increased SMNHPV SIRs in multivariable analysis. Conclusions Childhood cancer survivors are at increased risk for SMN in sites susceptible to HPV‐associated malignancies. Further research examining HPV in the etiology of SMN and the promotion of HPV vaccination and surveillance guidelines for SMNHPV in cancer survivors is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207