Geometric Changes in the Parotid, Submandibular, and Thyroid Glands during Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) acts on the tumor and affects surrounding organs at risk (OARs). This study aimed to quantify the geometric changes in the parotid gland, the submandibular gland (SMG), and the thyroid, during the course of treatment. Methods: Twenty patients diagnosed with locally advanced NPC were consecutively enrolled, and received definitive chemoradiotherapy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. Each patient underwent planning computed tomography (pCT) followed by six weekly repeat CTs (rCTs) without contrast enhancement. Each rCT was rigidly registered to its pCT. Changes in terms of volume, position, and shape of the OARs were assessed. Differences in left- and right-sided OARs were compared. Results: Radiation doses to the parotid, SMG, and thyroid were 32.12 ± 11.2 Gy (mean ± standard deviation SD), 25.46 ± 8.62 Gy, and 18.89 ± 10.24 Gy, respectively. Volume reductions of 28.6% ± 14.6% (mean ± SD), 26.6% ± 17.1%, and 12.3% ± 11.3% were observed in the parotid, SMG, and thyroid, respectively. Rate of volume loss for the parotid and SMG decreased from 1.6-1.7% per day in the first week to 0.5%-0.6% in the last week. Contrarily, not all thyroid lobes decreased in volume during treatment. The center of mass of the parotid shifted 2.0-2.6 mm medially; for the SMG and thyroid, a 0.1-0.5 mm medial shift was noted. The displacement in the anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions was < 0.6 mm. The 3-dimensional vector displacements of the parotid and SMG were 2.2-2.9 mm, and that of thyroid was 4.0-4.3 mm. The overlapping metrics of all three OARs decreased over time, and the shortest perpendicular distance increased from 1.5-1.8 mm in the first week to 2.4-2.5 mm in the last week. The geometric differences between weeks were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: The volume, position, and shape of the OARs changed significantly during IMRT for NPC. These geometric changes displayed a time association, suggesting the necessity to re-plan treatment for better sparing of these OARs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".