InteractionR: An R package for full reporting of effect modification and interaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h2>Abstract</h2> Effect modification and/or Interaction are frequently assessed in epidemiological research. However, in most cases, authors do not present sufficient information for the readers to fully assess the extent and significance of interaction on both additive and multiplicative scale. Also, due to being readily available in most software, the delta method has proliferated in the literature for the estimation of confidence intervals (CIs) for measures of additive interactions; despite its well documented poor performance compared to alternative methods. We introduce <i>interactionR</i>, an open-source R package with user-friendly functions that ensures full reporting of effect modification or interaction based on recommended guidelines. In addition to the simple asymptotic delta method, the package also allows for estimation of CIs for additive interaction measures using the variance recovery and percentile bootstrapping methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it