Review: <i>Empire and the Making of Native Title: Sovereignty, Property and Indigenous People</i>, by Bain Attwood
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| November 01 2021 Review: Empire and the Making of Native Title: Sovereignty, Property and Indigenous People, by Bain Attwood Empire and the Making of Native Title: Sovereignty, Property and Indigenous People. By Bain Attwood. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020. xiv + 442 pp.) Kirsten Anker Kirsten Anker McGill University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Pacific Historical Review (2021) 90 (4): 540–541. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2021.90.4.540 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Kirsten Anker; Review: Empire and the Making of Native Title: Sovereignty, Property and Indigenous People, by Bain Attwood. Pacific Historical Review 1 November 2021; 90 (4): 540–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2021.90.4.540 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentPacific Historical Review Search “Why do things happen the way they do?” In comparative Indigenous law and politics, this question is often asked of the fact that some colonial regimes entered treaties and others did not. Scholars frequently point to factors like the distinctive policies or legal regimes of different European powers, the influence of humanitarian or other attitudes to colonial “others,” local exigencies and incentives related to trade or military strategy, and the capacities, intentions, and existing legalities of Indigenous parties. With respect to Australia and New Zealand, both claimed for the British by Captain James Cook and overseen by the same Colonial Office, but where officials only entered into a treaty—the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi—with Maori in New Zealand, the differentials are harder to parse. In Bain Attwood’s latest book Empire and the Making of Native Title: Sovereignty, Property and Indigenous... © 2021 by the Pacific Coast Branch, American Historical Association2021 You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it