Linearization of Aircraft Landing Equations of Motion with Airframe Flexibility Effects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div>The conventional approach in aircraft landing loads analysis, such as for shock absorber development, is using a nonlinear set of equations and a modal representation of the airframe. For preliminary shock absorber design studies, a linearized set of equations may provide a highly efficient simulation method to limit the parameter space of linear shock absorber models. This article develops a set of linearized equations of motion to simulate the landing touchdown event while capturing airframe flexibility effects using a transfer function. The linearized flexible model demonstrates the ability to generally capture flexibility effects and output responses of interest with a significantly reduced simulation time compared to both fully flexible and nonlinear reduced-order models. The linearization of a Fiala tire model is accomplished by scaling the longitudinal tire stiffness such that the peak tire drag force matches that of the nonlinear model, and the vertical tire stiffness is obtained from a linear regression of a nonlinear vertical force versus deflection curve through an expected range of tire deflection.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it