MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204385337 · doi:10.12957/neiba.2021.58881

The Other Side of the Renminbi: Applying Robert Cox’s Critical Theory to the China-Latin American Relations l O Outro Lado do Renminbi: Aplicando a Teoria Crítica de Robert Cox às Relações entre China e América Latina

2021· article· pt· W3204385337 on OpenAlexaff
Rodrigo Curty Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Neiba Cadernos Argentina Brasil · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansChinaRenminbiForeign direct investmentWelfare economicsPolitical scienceEconomyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through literature review and thematic analysis, I investigated the main material capacities, ideas and institutions forming the economic relationship between China, Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). I analyzed the flows of Chinese foreign direct investment, finance and trade into the region, the conflicts caused by Chinese companies and the social forces they involve. I found that this relationship is concentrated in primary sectors, contributing to an inter-industry logic between LAC and China, and deepening an export model based on commodities, which causes considerable environmental impacts in the region. The narrative presented by Chinese and Latin-American leaders, however, is that their cooperation promotes “common development”. I concluded that, despite China’s economic importance to LAC, their relationship perpetuates a pattern of inequality and dependency similar to that of traditional Western powers. Nevertheless, oppressed social forces in the region have been resisting this pattern and developing strategies to build a fairer alternative. Keywords: China; Latin America and the Caribbean; Critical Theory. RESUMO Através de revisão bibliográfica e análise temática, esta pesquisa investigou as principais capacidades materiais, ideias e instituições que formam a relação econômica entre China, América Latina e Caribe (ALC). Eu analisei os fluxos chineses de investimento estrangeiro direto, finanças e comércio, os conflitos causados por empresas chinesas e as forças sociais envolvidas. Descobri que essa relação está concentrada em setores primários, contribuindo para uma lógica interindustrial entre ALC e China, e para o aprofundamento de um modelo de exportação baseado em commodities, causando consideráveis impactos ambientais. A narrativa apresentada por líderes chineses e latino-americanos, porém, é que sua cooperação promove o “desenvolvimento comum”. Concluo que, apesar da importância econômica da China para a ALC, seu relacionamento perpetua um padrão de desigualdade e dependência semelhante ao das potências ocidentais tradicionais. Entretanto, as forças sociais oprimidas latino-americanas têm resistido a esse padrão e desenvolvido estratégias para construir uma alternativa mais justa. Palavras-chave: China; América Latina e Caribe; Teoria Crítica. Recebido em: 02/04/2021 | Aceito em: 04/06/2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Neiba Cadernos Argentina BrasilSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207