MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204422403 · doi:10.30683/1929-2279.2020.09.03

The Role of BRAF Gene in Cancer: Literature Review and Future Directions

2020· article· en· W3204422403 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ricardo Hsieh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cancer research updates · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVemurafenibCancer researchCancerMelanomaTargeted therapyThyroid cancerDabrafenibColorectal cancerMedicineKinaseLung cancerMutationMetastasisBiologyOncologyInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The BRAF gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays an important role in regulating the MAP kinase signaling pathway, which is involved in cellular development, differentiation, division, proliferation, secretion, inflammatory responses and apoptosis in mammalian cells. Since 2002, the mutation of valine 600 to glutamic acid (V600E) is the most prevalent, and it is found to be recurrent in many cancer types. It is frequently identified cancer-causing mutation in melanoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, glioneuronal tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of lung, ovarian cancer, and also others malignancies and some cancer metastasis. In the early 1990s, some researchers began studying MAP kinase signaling pathway involved in controlling cell growth and its role in cancer, and it helped identify targets for new classes of cancer therapy. Later BRAF mutation was found in over 50% of melanomas. The overactive BRAF protein expression looked like an attractive drug target. Elucidating the detailed molecular structure of the mutant protein helped pharmaceutical companies developed selective inhibitors of mutated BRAF, including Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib, which have been approved to treat melanoma by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In addition, there is a growing number of targeted agents that are being evaluated to treat various BRAF-mutant advanced cancer (especially melanoma, lung, thyroid and colorectal cancer), including other RAF kinase inhibitors and/or MEK inhibitors. The standard therapy of inhibition of BRAF mutation in advanced melanoma and/or others malignancies, improved clinical benefit compared to chemotherapy. In the meantime, intrinsic and acquired resistances are still key challenges by using these drugs. The future research is heading to understand the mechanisms of the resistance, therefore it will help us to understand diseases biology and continuously bringing new therapeutic strategies for melanoma and/or others malignancies, including other drugs combination and next-generation of BRAF inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cancer research updatesSame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207