Microspheres and Nanorods Produced in the Dissolution of Mildly Carboxylated Cellulose Fibers in Alkaline Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A mild etherification of spruce kraft pulp was performed to introduce 1.3 and 2.5 mmol/g carboxyl groups on cellulose chains. 1.3 mmol/g carboxymethyl fibers (CMF) were dissolved partially in alkaline water to form balloons and collars on the tracheid and their ultra-structure was investigated. Primary wall, expanded S1, swollen S2, wrinkled S3, spiral bands of S1, parallel microfibrils of S2 and their transverse splitting were observed on swollen fibers. It is indicated that balloons, collars and wrinkled S3 were formed due to different cellulose microfibril features in different layers of tracheid cell wall. Microspheres with a size up to about 0.6 µm were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It is shown that they originated from transverse splitting of S2 microfibrils and contain bundles of well-known cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). After homogenization and sonication of an aqueous dispersion of 2.5 mmol/g CMF, electroacoustic spectroscopy showed the presence of nanorods with a size distribution of 18-208 nm. Similar sizes were observed by TEM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".