MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204481921 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-ics.64

64 Outcomes following surgical repair of anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries

2021· article· en· W3204481921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Luiz de Mello Nicoletti, Gareth Hooks, Adam Graham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary arteriesInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyCardiologyAnginaEuroSCOREArteryCoronary sinusMedical recordCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyRight coronary arteryUnstable anginaAortic sinusSurgeryCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Although coronary arteries that arise from the opposite sinus of Valsalva have a known association with sudden cardiac death, they most commonly present to cardiologists and cardiac surgeons with symptoms of either typical or atypical angina. This retrospective study aimed to examine the outcomes of a consecutive set of patients who underwent surgical repair of their anomalous coronary arteries under the care of one cardiac surgeon from 2010 to date. <h3>Methods</h3> The hospital cardiac surgery records were searched for keywords to identify all retrospective cases of coronary artery anomalies since 2010. Eligible patients were contacted and surveyed about their symptoms and their electronic healthcare records were checked. Only patients who underwent a primary procedure to correct their anomalous coronary artery were selected for this study to reduce the confounding impact of other procedures on the outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> Twelve eligible cases of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery were identified. The mean age of patients was 52.9 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1 and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 2.15. In eight cases (67%) the right coronary artery originated from the left sinus and in four cases (33%) the left coronary artery, or its associated branches, originated from the right sinus. All cases had a malignant course and all patients were symptomatic. Eleven patients (92%) had complete resolution (n=2, 17%) or significant improvement (n=9, 75%) of their preoperative symptoms with only one patient (8%) reporting no significant improvement. There were no mortalities, however two patients had significant complications related to myocardial ischaemia during surgery. There were no recorded major adverse cardiac events or deaths at five years [table 1]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This small cohort of anomalous coronary artery repairs suggest that these are relatively safe procedures. This study also suggests that repair should be considered in this age group when patients are symptomatic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207