MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204551884 · doi:10.18280/acsm.450407

Research on the Damping Performance of Mining Highly Efficient Water-Retaining Colloidal Material Against the Spontaneous Combustion of Coal

2021· article· en· W3204551884 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongfei Jin, Yan Li, Yin Liu, Chuansheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColloidMaterials scienceCoalCombustionChemical engineeringComposite materialWaste managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to solve the shortcomings of the traditional mining anti-extinguishing gel material such as low strength and poor water retention, a high hydrocolloid anti-extinguishing material was developed with sodium alginate and light calcium carbonate as the base material and gluconolactone as the retarder, which was mixed and reacted. The base material ratio of highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material for coal void filling was determined as 2% SA + 0.5% PCC + 1% GDL with a moulding time of 4.5 min, while the base material ratio of highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material for extinguishing high temperature fires was 2.5% SA + 1% PCC + 1% GDL with a moulding time of 2.5 min. The highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material was found to reduce the concentration of signature gas and delay the characteristic temperature point and increase the activation energy of coal oxidation, which indicates that the highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material can effectively inhibit the spontaneous combustion process of coal at low temperature stage. Infrared spectroscopy experiments were conducted to investigate the microscopic resistance mechanism of the highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material, and the results showed that the highly efficient water-retaining colloidal material mainly reduce the activity of Ar-C-O-, -COO-, -CH3, -CH2 and -OH in coal to inhibit the spontaneous combustion of coal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207