MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204619957 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20044937

Evaluation of Three Cow-side Tests for Detection of Subclinical Ketosis in Fresh Cows

2004· article· en· W3204619957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Carrier, Steven Stewart, S. Godden, John Fetrow, Paul Rapnicki

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubclinical infectionKetosisMedicineAbomasumAnimal scienceAnimal healthVeterinary medicineRumenFood scienceInternal medicineBiologyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subclinical ketosis in dairy cattle can lead to economic losses through decreased milk production, decreased reproductive performance, increased risk of displaced abomasum and increased risk of clinical ketosis. For early detection of the disease, there is a need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tests.
 The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of three cow-side diagnostic tests for the detection of subclinical ketosis in fresh dairy cows, compared to the gold standard serum β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA). The cow-side tests were: (1) a commonly used test strip detecting acetoacetate in urine (Ketostix, Bayer Corporation, Elkhart, Indiana, USA), (2) a commonly used powder test used on milk, also detecting acetoacetate (KetoCheck, Great States Animal Health, St. Joseph, Missouri, USA), and (3) a milk test strip detecting BHBA (KetoTest, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan, distributed by Elanco Animal Health/Provel, Guelph, Ontario, Canada).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207