MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204629188

An Economic analysis of Gandhian principles as a tool for economic recovery

2021· article· en· W3204629188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C Raghu.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCroreRecessionUnemploymentEconomic liberalizationEconomic recoveryQuarter (Canadian coin)LiberalizationEconomicsPandemicDevelopment economicsEconomyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Economic growthGeographyPovertyMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The condition of the economy, went from bad to worse, due to outburst of pandemic Covid-19. The economic impact of Covid 19 (Corona Virus) on Indian Economy has been largely devastating and disruptive. Indian Economy was shattered and faced worst scenarios. According to Ministry of Statistics, in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2020, India’s economy has grown at a meager 3.1%. Krishnamurthy Subramanian, the present chief economic adviser to the Government of India said that “this drop is mainly due to the corona virus pandemic effect on the Indian economy”. Unemployment rose from 6.7% on 15th March to 26% on 19th April 2020 and then back down to pre-lockdown levels by mid-June. During the lockdown, an estimated 14 crore (140 million) people lost employment, while salaries were cut for many others. More than 45% of households across the nation have reported an income drop as compared to the previous year. World bank defines this pandemic as “magnified pre-existing risks to India’s economic outlook”, because the economic slowdown was very much noticeable even during pre-pandemic. The World Bank and other rating agencies had initially revised India’s growth for fiscal year 2021, with the lowest figures, India has ever seen in three decades, since India’s economic liberalization in the 1990s. On 26th May 2020, CRISIL announced that, this is perhaps, India’s worst recession since independence. All these features indicate that the reforms strategy of development is not yielding the desired results. It has miserably failed to accelerate the process of development. It calls for better supplementary economic strategy for the development of the economy in general and rural economy in particular. This points to the necessity for rethinking in the planning and development strategy, not in terms of the size of the plan but in terms of decentralized planning as a supplement to reforms strategy. Therefore, in the present context, to set motion of the economy and to accelerate its growth process Gandhian strategy of development will be more opt and it will surely quicken the pace of development. This paper analyses the relevance and need of Gandhian economic principles to speed up economic development of pandemic affected economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchSame topicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesFrench-language works237,207